I am professor and former Chair of Business Dynamics, Innovation, and Economic Change at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany, and a research professor at the Halle Institute for Economics (IWH). I am also Associate Editor of the academic journals “Regional Studies” and “Small Business Economics”.
Ich bin Professor für Volkswirtschaftslehre (Unternehmensentwicklung, Innovation und wirtschaftlichen Wandel) an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena sowie Forschungsprofessor am Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH). Weiterhin bin ich als Associate Editor der Fachzeitschriften „Regional Studies“ und „Small Business Economics“ tätig.
CURRENT EVENTS / AKTUELLES
August 11, 2020: A new editorial of Regional Studies „Regions in time of pandemic“ is now available online and will be published in the September issue. The article contains lots of interesting material. See https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1798611
July 07, 2020: Just published in a regular issue: Michael Fritsch and Moritz Zoellner: The Fluidity of Inventor Networks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09726-z
June 18, 2020: Gerade ist das schöne Themenheft „Vereint nach drei Jahrzehnten?“ der Zeitschrift Bürger & Staat erschienen. Darin enthalten is mein Aufsatz „Ökonomisch vereint? Wirtschaftliche Unterschiede zwischen Ost- und Westdeutschland dreißig Jahre nach der Wende“. In diesem Beitrag gebe ich einen Überblick über Gründe für Entwicklungsunterschiede zwischen Ost- und Westdeutschland seit dem zweiten Weltkrieg. Download Bürger & Staat 30_Jahre_Einheit 2020
June 7, 2020: Here is a new Working Paper: Michael Fritsch, Maria Kristalova and Michael Wyrwich: Regional trajectories of entrepreneurship: the effect of socialism and transition. https://ideas.repec.org/p/jrp/jrpwrp/2020-010.html
Abstract: We investigate how major historical shocks affect regional trajectories of economic activity. To this end, we conduct a comparative analysis of the development of entrepreneurship in East and West Germany after World War II. The introduction of an anti-entrepreneurial socialist economy in East Germany in 1949, and the subsequent transformation to a market economy four decades later were major historical shocks to the economy in general, and to entrepreneurship specifically. Our comparative analysis of East and West Germany assesses how these shocks affected the level of entrepreneurship at the regional level. Surprisingly, our results show that socialism does not have a long-run negative effect on the prevalence of self-employment in East Germany, despite the severe anti-entrepreneurial policies prevalent in Soviet-style socialism. Quite to the contrary, there is actually a positive treatment effect of German separation and reunification. Further analyses suggest that current structural differences in regional levels of self-employment in Germany are not pre-dominantly due to the socialist legacy of the East, but mainly a result of the shock transformation that occurred with reunification.
June 2nd, 2020: Finally published ! Michael Fritsch, Mirko Titze and Matthias Piontek „Identifying Cooperation for Innovation―A Comparison of Data Sources.“ Industry and Innovation, 27, 630–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1650253
May 26, 2020: The OECD, the Kauffman Foundation and the Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum organize a Zoom webinar on “Entrepreneurial Recovery from COVID-19: A Comparative Forum” tomorrow, May 27, from 3 to 4:30 pm CET. Speakers include Edward Glaeser, Patricia Greene, Francesca Lotti, Chad Moutray, Gunilla Nordlof, Jonathan Potter, and myself. Registration link https://kauffman.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_uQ3XJwDYQYOOD5Llokywyw
April 21, 2020: In the Section „Material“, „Start-up Compendium (Gründungsatlas)“ you can download comprehensive data on new business formation in German regions in the period 1976-2016. The time series will be extended as soon as data for further years are available.
April 21, 2020: Finally out: Michael Fritsch and Michael Wyrwich „Langfristige regionale Trends unternehmerischer Selbständigkeit reflektieren unternehmerische Kultur“ (Long-term regional trends of self-employment reflect entrepreneurial culture). In Katharina Hölzle, Victor Tiberius and Heike Surrey (eds.): Perspektiven des Entrepreneurships: Unternehmerische Konzepte zwischen Theorie und Praxis. 447-460 (Ch. 33), Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
Zusammenfassung: In vielen Regionen ist das Niveau unternehmerischer Selbständigkeit über längere Zeiträume sehr persistent. Diese Persistenz zeigt sich auch dann, wenn die regionale Wirtschaft drastischen Änderungen der wirtschaftlich-gesellschaftlichen Rahmenbedingungen ausgesetzt war. Eine Erklärung für diesen Befund besteht darin, dass ein hohes Niveau an unternehmerischer Selbständigkeit mit einer unternehmerischen Kultur verbunden ist. Solch eine unternehmerische Kultur lässt sich als eine informelle Institution auffassen, die sich nur über relativ lange Zeiträume verändert. Wir beschreiben die verschiedenen Elemente einer solchen Kultur unternehmerischer Selbständigkeit und gehen auf ihre Bedeutung für regionale Entwicklung ein. Abschließend weisen wir auf wirtschaftspolitische Implikationen sowie auf weiteren Forschungsbedarf hin.
April 18, 2020: The Corona crisis keeps me and my co-authors busy. Here are some new papers:
Henriette Ruhrmann, Michael Fritsch and Loet Leydesdorff: Smart Specialization Strategies at National, Regional, or Local Levels? Synergy and Policy-making in German Systems of Innovation. : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3577495
Abstract: Employing a quantitative, data-driven tool – the Triple Helix Indicator – to microdata of firms in Germany, we develop an evidence base for innovation-policy strategies. We aim to answer the question which level of government (local, regional, national) might be most effective for strategic innovation policy-making based on smart specialization in Germany. The empirical results show that the country is decentralized to the extent that it cannot be considered a “national” innovation system. More than two-thirds of innovation-system synergy is generated at the lower levels of districts (NUTS3) and Governmental Regions (NUTS2). In high-tech and medium-tech manufacturing, former East and West Germany, as well as North and South Germany, can be considered separate sub-national innovation systems. These findings strengthen the case for region- and context-specific innovation policies. The results illustrate the value of the Triple Helix Indicator for systematic regional mapping and serve as evidence for policy-makers to expand RIS3 policy strategies to the regional and local level in Germany.
Michael Fritsch, Martin Obschonka, Fabian Wahl and Michael Wyrwich: The Deep Cultural Imprint of Roman Sandals: Evidence of Long-lasting Effects of Roman Rule on Personality, Economic Performance, and Well-Being in Germany. https://ideas.repec.org/p/jrp/jrpwrp/2020-005.html
Abstract: We investigate whether the Roman presence in the southern part of Germany nearly 2,000 years ago had a deep imprinting effect with long run consequences on a broad spectrum of measures ranging from present-day personality profiles to a number of socioeconomic outcomes and why. Today’s populations living in the former Roman part of Germany score indeed higher on certain personality traits, have higher life and health satisfaction, longer life expectancy, generate more inventions and behave in a more entrepreneurial way. These findings help explain that regions under Roman rule have higher present-day levels of economic development in terms of GDP per capita. The effects hold when controlling for other potential historical influences. When addressing potential channels of a long term effect of Roman rule the data indicates that the Roman road network plays an important role as a mechanism in the cultural imprinting that is still perceptible today.
April 18, 2020: The second revised edition of the textbook „Ökonomische Geographie“ (in German), edited by Johannes Bröcker and myself just came out. Many thanks to everyone who has contributed. My own contributions to the book are the chapters „Entrepreneurship und regionale Entwicklung“ (Entrepreneurship and Regional Development) and „Innovation und Regionalentwicklung“ (Innovation and Regional Development). See https://www.beck-shop.de/oekonomische-geographie/product/29982744?adword=google&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIiPCMxvWe6AIVk0DTCh0Z_w71EAAYASAAEgKu-_D_BwE
April 10, 2020: Together with a larger number of colleagues (Andrea Herrmann, Gresa Latifi, Balazs Pager, Laszlo Szerb, Elisa Terragno Bogliaccini, Mark Sanders and Michael Wyrwich) I have contributed to the book Financial and Institutional Reforms for an Entrepreneurial Society in Europe Part II: Tailoring a Reform Strategy to Germany, Italy and the UK, edited by Axel Marx, Mark Sanders and Mikael Stenkula (Berlin 2020: Springer). We designed A Reform Strategy for Germany (pp. 163-202). The text is open access https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61007-7_7
April 8, 2020: Not a secret anymore! Today is the 65th birthday of my good friend Helmuth Albrecht where he received a Festschrift that was prepared for this event. My contribution to the book (pp. 107-115) is the article „Innovation als interdisciplinäres Forschungsfeld“ (Innovation as an interdisziplinary research field). In this article I briefly review Helmuth’s work on the early development of Laser technology in Germany and the importance of historical innovation research. The book is titled Lebenswerk Welterbe – Aspekte von Industriekultur und Industriearchäologie, von Wissenschafts- und Technigeschichte. Festschrift für Helmuth Albrecht zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Michael Farrenkopf, Friederike Hansell and Norman Pohl, published at GNT-Verlag, Berlin 2020. https://www.gnt-verlag.de/lebenswerk-welterbe-2-1120-einleitung.html
March 4, 2020: Michael Wyrwich and I have published two new Working Papers on the geographic concentration of innovation activity. In these publications we challenge the common belief that innovation activities are considerably more successful and productive in large cities.
In the paper „Is innovation (increasingly) concentrated in large cities? An international comparison“ https://ideas.repec.org/p/jrp/jrpwrp/2020-003.html we investigate the geographic concentration of patenting in large cities using a sample of 14 developed countries. There is wide dispersion of the share of patented inventions in large metropolitan areas. South Korea and the US are two extreme outliers where patenting is highly concentrated in large cities. We do not find any general trend that there is a geographic concentration of patents for the period 2000-2014. There is also no general trend that inventors in large cities have more patents than in rural areas (scaling). Hence, while agglomeration economies of large cities may offer advantages for innovation activities, the extent of these advantages is not very large. We conclude that popular theories over-emphasize the importance of large cities for innovation activities.
The second paper „Does Successful Innovation Require Large Cities? Germany as a Counterexample“ https://ideas.repec.org/p/jrp/jrpwrp/2020-004.html deals with the geograph of innovation in Germany. The country provides a clear couterexample to theories that highlight the role of large cities for innovative activity. We argue that a main force behind the geography of innovation in Germany is the country’s federal tradition that has shaped the settlement structure, the geographic distribution of universities and public research institutions, as well as local access to finance. We demonstrate the long-lasting effect of the historical political structure and distribution of knowledge sources on innovation activities today. We conclude that historical factors that shape the settlement structure and location of knowledge sources are of key importance for the geographic location of innovation activities.
March 4, 2020: My paper with Javier Changoluisa „New Business Formation and Incumbents’ Perception of Competitive Pressure“ is now published in the Review of Industrial Organization, 56 (2020), 165-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-019-09699-1
February 16, 2020: Just published: Michael Fritsch, Alina Sorgner and Michael Wywich: Entrepreneurship and Job Satisfaction: The Role of Age. In Charlie Karlsson, Mikaela Backman and Orsa Kekezi (eds.): Handbook on Entrepreneurship and Aging. Cheltenham 2020: Elgar, 269-282. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116213.00018 More detailed analyses of this interesting topic are in the pipeline!